Yatırımcı.AI

FP4 vs IZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FP4 (One Portföy Dördüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

FP4IZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FP4 vs IZS Fund Comparison
MetricFP4IZSCategory median
Today (est.)−7.83%—−1.70%
Daily−1.66%0.06%0.19%
1 week−7.46%0.13%0.42%
1 month−42.05%5.36%0.94%
3 months−57.96%20.78%5.89%
6 months−58.92%28.57%12.86%
YTD−57.48%18.69%18.07%
1 year−53.71%18.66%24.44%
3 years—146.37%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 18:03.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FP4 vs IZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FP4 (One Portföy Dördüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FP4 leads in 3 and IZS leads in 7. FP4 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IZS leads (0.06% vs −1.66%). 1 week: IZS leads (0.13% vs −7.46%). 1 month: IZS leads (5.36% vs −42.05%). 3 months: IZS leads (20.78% vs −57.96%). 6 months: IZS leads (28.57% vs −58.92%). YTD: IZS leads (18.69% vs −57.48%). 1 year: IZS leads (18.66% vs −53.71%). Size (TRY): FP4 leads (74.8M vs 74M). Investors: FP4 leads (104 vs 76). Risk: FP4 leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FP4 returned −57.48% and IZS returned 18.69%; over the last year FP4 returned −53.71% and IZS returned 18.66%. Over the last month FP4 returned −42.05% and IZS returned 5.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FP4 has a size of TRY 74.8M with 104 investors, while IZS has a size of TRY 74M with 76 investors. FP4 leads in size and FP4 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FP4 is 6 out of 7 and that of IZS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.