Yatırımcı.AI

IYB vs YLC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IYB (Aura Portföy Değişken Fonu) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) side by side.

IYBYLC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IYB vs YLC Fund Comparison
MetricIYBYLCCategory median
Daily−0.33%−1.31%−0.41%
1 week−0.87%−1.70%−1.69%
1 month−3.86%−5.21%−3.34%
3 months−4.13%−6.53%0.00%
6 months−0.88%−0.65%4.10%
YTD20.33%20.08%21.58%
1 year30.44%25.19%30.90%
3 years164.55%75.06%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IYB vs YLC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IYB (Aura Portföy Değişken Fonu) and YLC (Ata Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IYB leads in 9 and YLC leads in 2. IYB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YLC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IYB leads (−0.33% vs −1.31%). 1 week: IYB leads (−0.87% vs −1.70%). 1 month: IYB leads (−3.86% vs −5.21%). 3 months: IYB leads (−4.13% vs −6.53%). 6 months: YLC leads (−0.65% vs −0.88%). YTD: IYB leads (20.33% vs 20.08%). 1 year: IYB leads (30.44% vs 25.19%). 3 years: IYB leads (164.55% vs 75.06%). Size (TRY): IYB leads (70.5M vs 66.1M). Investors: YLC leads (1,144 vs 179). Risk: IYB leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IYB returned 20.33% and YLC returned 20.08%; over the last year IYB returned 30.44% and YLC returned 25.19%. Over the last month IYB returned −3.86% and YLC returned −5.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, IYB has a size of TRY 70.5M with 179 investors, while YLC has a size of TRY 66.1M with 1,144 investors. IYB leads in size and YLC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IYB is 4 out of 7 and that of YLC is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.