ITC vs NKM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ITC (Inveo Portföy Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NKM (Neo Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ITC | NKM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.13% | −3.07% | −2.50% |
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | 0.11% | 0.91% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −4.06% | −10.64% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | −6.19% | −8.92% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | −0.78% | 0.40% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 10.98% | −8.12% | 19.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ITC vs NKM comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ITC (Inveo Portföy Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NKM (Neo Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ITC leads in 4 and NKM leads in 5. ITC is a Stock Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKM is a Stock Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): ITC leads (−2.13% vs −3.07%). Daily: NKM leads (0.82% vs 0.09%). 1 week: NKM leads (0.91% vs 0.11%). 1 month: ITC leads (−4.06% vs −10.64%). 3 months: ITC leads (−6.19% vs −8.92%). 6 months: NKM leads (0.40% vs −0.78%). YTD: ITC leads (10.98% vs −8.12%). Size (TRY): NKM leads (33M vs 27.5M). Investors: NKM leads (371 vs 244).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ITC or NKM?
Year to date ITC returned 10.98% and NKM returned −8.12%; over the last year ITC returned — and NKM returned —. Over the last month ITC returned −4.06% and NKM returned −10.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ITC or NKM?
As of September 28, 2026, ITC has a size of TRY 27.5M with 244 investors, while NKM has a size of TRY 33M with 371 investors. NKM leads in size and NKM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ITC and NKM mean?
The CMB risk score of ITC is 6 out of 7 and that of NKM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.