HVI vs NKM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVI (Deniz Portföy Holdingler ve İştirakleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NKM (Neo Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | HVI | NKM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.96% | −3.07% | −2.50% |
| Daily | 0.47% | 0.82% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | −1.04% | 0.91% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −4.27% | −10.64% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | −1.86% | −8.92% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 9.34% | 0.40% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 17.92% | −8.12% | 19.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the HVI vs NKM comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of HVI (Deniz Portföy Holdingler ve İştirakleri Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) and NKM (Neo Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, HVI leads in 6 and NKM leads in 3. HVI is a Stock Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NKM is a Stock Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): HVI leads (−1.96% vs −3.07%). Daily: NKM leads (0.82% vs 0.47%). 1 week: NKM leads (0.91% vs −1.04%). 1 month: HVI leads (−4.27% vs −10.64%). 3 months: HVI leads (−1.86% vs −8.92%). 6 months: HVI leads (9.34% vs 0.40%). YTD: HVI leads (17.92% vs −8.12%). Size (TRY): HVI leads (34.6M vs 33M). Investors: NKM leads (371 vs 316).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, HVI or NKM?
Year to date HVI returned 17.92% and NKM returned −8.12%; over the last year HVI returned — and NKM returned —. Over the last month HVI returned −4.27% and NKM returned −10.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, HVI or NKM?
As of September 28, 2026, HVI has a size of TRY 34.6M with 316 investors, while NKM has a size of TRY 33M with 371 investors. HVI leads in size and NKM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of HVI and NKM mean?
The CMB risk score of HVI is 6 out of 7 and that of NKM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.