Yatırımcı.AI

IJZ vs VVA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJZ (İş Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVA (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

IJZVVA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IJZ vs VVA Fund Comparison
MetricIJZVVACategory median
Daily−2.25%−1.77%−0.83%
1 week−1.72%−2.29%−0.98%
1 month−4.38%−5.16%−1.82%
3 months9.49%2.34%3.78%
6 months52.77%9.72%14.04%
YTD51.61%24.38%24.40%
1 year45.56%29.55%34.17%
3 years234.83%150.64%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IJZ vs VVA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IJZ (İş Portföy Siber Güvenlik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVA (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresıf Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IJZ leads in 8 and VVA leads in 2. IJZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVA is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: VVA leads (−1.77% vs −2.25%). 1 week: IJZ leads (−1.72% vs −2.29%). 1 month: IJZ leads (−4.38% vs −5.16%). 3 months: IJZ leads (9.49% vs 2.34%). 6 months: IJZ leads (52.77% vs 9.72%). YTD: IJZ leads (51.61% vs 24.38%). 1 year: IJZ leads (45.56% vs 29.55%). 3 years: IJZ leads (234.83% vs 150.64%). Size (TRY): VVA leads (892.4M vs 861.1M). Investors: IJZ leads (14,551 vs 10,025).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IJZ returned 51.61% and VVA returned 24.38%; over the last year IJZ returned 45.56% and VVA returned 29.55%. Over the last month IJZ returned −4.38% and VVA returned −5.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IJZ has a size of TRY 861.1M with 14,551 investors, while VVA has a size of TRY 892.4M with 10,025 investors. VVA leads in size and IJZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IJZ is 6 out of 7 and that of VVA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.