Yatırımcı.AI

IJT vs NBZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

IJTNBZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IJT vs NBZ Fund Comparison
MetricIJTNBZCategory median
Daily−0.79%0.06%0.01%
1 week−3.39%0.40%0.30%
1 month−4.52%1.86%0.00%
3 months−5.16%6.05%3.96%
6 months6.53%12.57%8.18%
YTD21.74%19.12%15.73%
1 year23.96%23.31%20.69%
3 years71.10%100.12%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IJT vs NBZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IJT (İş Portföy Tarım Serbest Fon) and NBZ (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IJT leads in 4 and NBZ leads in 6. IJT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBZ leads (0.06% vs −0.79%). 1 week: NBZ leads (0.40% vs −3.39%). 1 month: NBZ leads (1.86% vs −4.52%). 3 months: NBZ leads (6.05% vs −5.16%). 6 months: NBZ leads (12.57% vs 6.53%). YTD: IJT leads (21.74% vs 19.12%). 1 year: IJT leads (23.96% vs 23.31%). 3 years: NBZ leads (100.12% vs 71.10%). Size (TRY): IJT leads (1.2B vs 1B). Investors: IJT leads (1,467 vs 160).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IJT returned 21.74% and NBZ returned 19.12%; over the last year IJT returned 23.96% and NBZ returned 23.31%. Over the last month IJT returned −4.52% and NBZ returned 1.86%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, IJT has a size of TRY 1.2B with 1,467 investors, while NBZ has a size of TRY 1B with 160 investors. IJT leads in size and IJT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IJT is 6 out of 7 and that of NBZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.