Yatırımcı.AI

IFV vs RBF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IFV (TEB Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

IFVRBF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IFV vs RBF Fund Comparison
MetricIFVRBFCategory median
Daily0.07%0.10%0.07%
1 week0.70%0.57%0.57%
1 month2.96%2.66%2.46%
3 months9.77%9.51%9.39%
6 months19.79%12.29%16.05%
YTD34.68%17.84%25.12%
1 year44.56%30.24%38.90%
3 years236.34%18.54%178.72%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IFV vs RBF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IFV (TEB Portföy Birinci Kısa Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları (TL) Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, IFV leads in 10 and RBF leads in 1. IFV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RBF leads (0.10% vs 0.07%). 1 week: IFV leads (0.70% vs 0.57%). 1 month: IFV leads (2.96% vs 2.66%). 3 months: IFV leads (9.77% vs 9.51%). 6 months: IFV leads (19.79% vs 12.29%). YTD: IFV leads (34.68% vs 17.84%). 1 year: IFV leads (44.56% vs 30.24%). 3 years: IFV leads (236.34% vs 18.54%). Size (TRY): IFV leads (23M vs 10.5M). Investors: IFV leads (195 vs 56). Risk: IFV leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IFV returned 34.68% and RBF returned 17.84%; over the last year IFV returned 44.56% and RBF returned 30.24%. Over the last month IFV returned 2.96% and RBF returned 2.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, IFV has a size of TRY 23M with 195 investors, while RBF has a size of TRY 10.5M with 56 investors. IFV leads in size and IFV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IFV is 2 out of 7 and that of RBF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.