Yatırımcı.AI

BBP vs RBF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BBP (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

BBPRBF
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BBP vs RBF Fund Comparison
MetricBBPRBFCategory median
Daily0.23%0.22%0.24%
1 week0.73%0.58%0.61%
1 month3.13%1.63%1.60%
3 months8.47%6.50%7.35%
6 months18.97%16.81%18.12%
YTD75.20%14.70%20.27%
1 year58.17%28.69%35.25%
3 years—18.54%164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BBP vs RBF comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BBP (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and RBF (Rota Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BBP leads in 9 and RBF leads in 1. BBP is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RBF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BBP leads (0.23% vs 0.22%). 1 week: BBP leads (0.73% vs 0.58%). 1 month: BBP leads (3.13% vs 1.63%). 3 months: BBP leads (8.47% vs 6.50%). 6 months: BBP leads (18.97% vs 16.81%). YTD: BBP leads (75.20% vs 14.70%). 1 year: BBP leads (58.17% vs 28.69%). Size (TRY): BBP leads (10.7M vs 10.3M). Investors: BBP leads (435 vs 63). Risk: RBF leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BBP returned 75.20% and RBF returned 14.70%; over the last year BBP returned 58.17% and RBF returned 28.69%. Over the last month BBP returned 3.13% and RBF returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BBP has a size of TRY 10.7M with 435 investors, while RBF has a size of TRY 10.3M with 63 investors. BBP leads in size and BBP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BBP is 6 out of 7 and that of RBF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.