Yatırımcı.AI

IDO vs PPJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IDO (İş Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and PPJ (Ak Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

IDOPPJ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IDO vs PPJ Fund Comparison
MetricIDOPPJCategory median
Daily0.09%0.10%−0.07%
1 week−0.46%0.70%−0.29%
1 month−0.30%3.29%0.00%
3 months5.90%10.28%4.33%
6 months10.48%21.87%11.90%
YTD12.30%33.54%14.97%
1 year17.84%47.43%21.27%
3 years26.69%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IDO vs PPJ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IDO (İş Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and PPJ (Ak Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, IDO leads in 2 and PPJ leads in 7. IDO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPJ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPJ leads (0.10% vs 0.09%). 1 week: PPJ leads (0.70% vs −0.46%). 1 month: PPJ leads (3.29% vs −0.30%). 3 months: PPJ leads (10.28% vs 5.90%). 6 months: PPJ leads (21.87% vs 10.48%). YTD: PPJ leads (33.54% vs 12.30%). 1 year: PPJ leads (47.43% vs 17.84%). Size (TRY): IDO leads (81.2B vs 64.5B). Investors: IDO leads (15,507 vs 6,609).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IDO returned 12.30% and PPJ returned 33.54%; over the last year IDO returned 17.84% and PPJ returned 47.43%. Over the last month IDO returned −0.30% and PPJ returned 3.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IDO has a size of TRY 81.2B with 15,507 investors, while PPJ has a size of TRY 64.5B with 6,609 investors. IDO leads in size and IDO leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IDO is — out of 7 and that of PPJ is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.