Yatırımcı.AI

ICV vs LGO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) and LGO (Atlas Portföy Algo Toros Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate LGO in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (November 13, 2026). LGO fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

ICVLGO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICV vs LGO Fund Comparison
MetricICVLGOCategory median
Daily0.01%−89.32%0.07%
1 week0.65%−87.59%0.51%
1 month2.64%−89.28%1.66%
3 months8.53%−94.27%3.04%
6 months13.47%−94.00%8.17%
YTD27.23%−92.61%17.49%
1 year31.69%−93.74%21.23%
3 years208.41%−60.63%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICV vs LGO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) and LGO (Atlas Portföy Algo Toros Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ICV leads in 11 and LGO leads in 0. ICV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; LGO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Atlas Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICV leads (0.01% vs −89.32%). 1 week: ICV leads (0.65% vs −87.59%). 1 month: ICV leads (2.64% vs −89.28%). 3 months: ICV leads (8.53% vs −94.27%). 6 months: ICV leads (13.47% vs −94.00%). YTD: ICV leads (27.23% vs −92.61%). 1 year: ICV leads (31.69% vs −93.74%). 3 years: ICV leads (208.41% vs −60.63%). Size (TRY): ICV leads (5.7M vs 5.6M). Investors: ICV leads (39 vs 11). Risk: ICV leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICV returned 27.23% and LGO returned −92.61%; over the last year ICV returned 31.69% and LGO returned −93.74%. Over the last month ICV returned 2.64% and LGO returned −89.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, ICV has a size of TRY 5.7M with 39 investors, while LGO has a size of TRY 5.6M with 11 investors. ICV leads in size and ICV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICV is 2 out of 7 and that of LGO is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.