Yatırımcı.AI

AS1 vs ICV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AS1 (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ICV (Teb Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

AS1ICV
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AS1 vs ICV Fund Comparison
MetricAS1ICVCategory median
Daily0.11%0.18%0.19%
1 week0.39%0.56%0.42%
1 month0.87%2.50%0.94%
3 months3.53%6.75%5.89%
6 months4.22%16.01%12.86%
YTD3.16%22.13%18.07%
1 year5.96%29.75%24.44%
3 years34.33%208.73%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AS1 vs ICV comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AS1 (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and ICV (Teb Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AS1 leads in 1 and ICV leads in 10. AS1 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; ICV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICV leads (0.18% vs 0.11%). 1 week: ICV leads (0.56% vs 0.39%). 1 month: ICV leads (2.50% vs 0.87%). 3 months: ICV leads (6.75% vs 3.53%). 6 months: ICV leads (16.01% vs 4.22%). YTD: ICV leads (22.13% vs 3.16%). 1 year: ICV leads (29.75% vs 5.96%). 3 years: ICV leads (208.73% vs 34.33%). Size (TRY): AS1 leads (6.4M vs 5.8M). Investors: ICV leads (44 vs 32). Risk: ICV leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AS1 returned 3.16% and ICV returned 22.13%; over the last year AS1 returned 5.96% and ICV returned 29.75%. Over the last month AS1 returned 0.87% and ICV returned 2.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AS1 has a size of TRY 6.4M with 32 investors, while ICV has a size of TRY 5.8M with 44 investors. AS1 leads in size and ICV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AS1 is 5 out of 7 and that of ICV is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.