Yatırımcı.AI

ICV vs IZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

ICVIZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICV vs IZS Fund Comparison
MetricICVIZSCategory median
Daily0.08%0.07%0.06%
1 week0.74%0.41%0.56%
1 month2.76%2.17%1.84%
3 months8.67%14.46%3.29%
6 months13.49%38.91%7.90%
YTD27.21%22.57%17.53%
1 year31.53%33.89%21.48%
3 years208.36%151.86%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICV vs IZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICV (TEB Portföy Ondokuzuncu Serbest Fon) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ICV leads in 6 and IZS leads in 4. ICV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICV leads (0.08% vs 0.07%). 1 week: ICV leads (0.74% vs 0.41%). 1 month: ICV leads (2.76% vs 2.17%). 3 months: IZS leads (14.46% vs 8.67%). 6 months: IZS leads (38.91% vs 13.49%). YTD: ICV leads (27.21% vs 22.57%). 1 year: IZS leads (33.89% vs 31.53%). 3 years: ICV leads (208.36% vs 151.86%). Size (TRY): IZS leads (7.3M vs 5.7M). Risk: ICV leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICV returned 27.21% and IZS returned 22.57%; over the last year ICV returned 31.53% and IZS returned 33.89%. Over the last month ICV returned 2.76% and IZS returned 2.17%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, ICV has a size of TRY 5.7M with 39 investors, while IZS has a size of TRY 7.3M with 39 investors. IZS leads in size and Tie leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICV is 2 out of 7 and that of IZS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.