ICS vs SHU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICS (Teb Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ICS | SHU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −2.69% | −1.97% |
| Daily | −0.25% | 0.06% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.29% | −16.95% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 1.01% | −28.53% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 4.58% | −27.73% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 7.64% | −16.14% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 12.38% | 5.37% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 13.15% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 73.04% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ICS vs SHU comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ICS (Teb Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ICS leads in 7 and SHU leads in 2. ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SHU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SHU leads (0.06% vs −0.25%). 1 week: ICS leads (−0.29% vs −16.95%). 1 month: ICS leads (1.01% vs −28.53%). 3 months: ICS leads (4.58% vs −27.73%). 6 months: ICS leads (7.64% vs −16.14%). YTD: ICS leads (12.38% vs 5.37%). Size (TRY): SHU leads (7.7M vs 7.6M). Investors: ICS leads (51 vs 4). Risk: ICS leads (0 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ICS or SHU?
Year to date ICS returned 12.38% and SHU returned 5.37%; over the last year ICS returned 13.15% and SHU returned —. Over the last month ICS returned 1.01% and SHU returned −28.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ICS or SHU?
As of September 28, 2026, ICS has a size of TRY 7.6M with 51 investors, while SHU has a size of TRY 7.7M with 4 investors. SHU leads in size and ICS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ICS and SHU mean?
The CMB risk score of ICS is 0 out of 7 and that of SHU is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.