Yatırımcı.AI

IEN vs SHU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IEN (İstanbul Portföy İnşaat Sektörü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

IENSHU
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

IEN vs SHU Fund Comparison
MetricIENSHUCategory median
Today (est.)−1.98%−2.27%−1.90%
Daily−0.59%0.06%0.19%
1 week0.01%−16.95%0.42%
1 month−9.21%−28.53%0.94%
3 months−11.13%−27.73%5.89%
6 months2.77%−16.14%12.86%
YTD13.50%5.37%18.07%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:19.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the IEN vs SHU comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IEN (İstanbul Portföy İnşaat Sektörü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and SHU (Sparta Portföy Üçüncü Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IEN leads in 8 and SHU leads in 2. IEN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SHU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Sparta Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): IEN leads (−1.98% vs −2.27%). Daily: SHU leads (0.06% vs −0.59%). 1 week: IEN leads (0.01% vs −16.95%). 1 month: IEN leads (−9.21% vs −28.53%). 3 months: IEN leads (−11.13% vs −27.73%). 6 months: IEN leads (2.77% vs −16.14%). YTD: IEN leads (13.50% vs 5.37%). Size (TRY): SHU leads (7.7M vs 7.6M). Investors: IEN leads (73 vs 4). Risk: IEN leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date IEN returned 13.50% and SHU returned 5.37%; over the last year IEN returned — and SHU returned —. Over the last month IEN returned −9.21% and SHU returned −28.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, IEN has a size of TRY 7.6M with 73 investors, while SHU has a size of TRY 7.7M with 4 investors. SHU leads in size and IEN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IEN is 6 out of 7 and that of SHU is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.