ICF vs PSH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICF (Teb Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu) and PSH (Deniz Portföy Perakende Sektörü Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ICF | PSH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.93% | −3.20% | −2.50% |
| Daily | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.47% |
| 1 week | 0.12% | −2.17% | −0.04% |
| 1 month | −3.56% | −12.95% | −5.83% |
| 3 months | −1.31% | −9.49% | −2.72% |
| 6 months | 12.87% | — | 8.69% |
| YTD | 22.77% | −7.17% | 19.95% |
| 1 year | 20.83% | — | 22.69% |
| 3 years | 92.46% | — | 94.93% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ICF vs PSH comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ICF (Teb Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu) and PSH (Deniz Portföy Perakende Sektörü Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, ICF leads in 7 and PSH leads in 1. ICF is a Stock Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PSH is a Stock Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş.
Highlights: Today (est.): ICF leads (−1.93% vs −3.20%). Daily: PSH leads (0.67% vs 0.28%). 1 week: ICF leads (0.12% vs −2.17%). 1 month: ICF leads (−3.56% vs −12.95%). 3 months: ICF leads (−1.31% vs −9.49%). YTD: ICF leads (22.77% vs −7.17%). Size (TRY): ICF leads (18.1M vs 16M). Investors: ICF leads (525 vs 293).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ICF or PSH?
Year to date ICF returned 22.77% and PSH returned −7.17%; over the last year ICF returned 20.83% and PSH returned —. Over the last month ICF returned −3.56% and PSH returned −12.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ICF or PSH?
As of September 28, 2026, ICF has a size of TRY 18.1M with 525 investors, while PSH has a size of TRY 16M with 293 investors. ICF leads in size and ICF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ICF and PSH mean?
The CMB risk score of ICF is 6 out of 7 and that of PSH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.