Yatırımcı.AI

ICF vs MTK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICF (TEB Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MTK (MT Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

ICFMTK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICF vs MTK Fund Comparison
MetricICFMTKCategory median
Today (est.)1.52%1.64%1.29%
Daily−0.20%−0.27%−0.44%
1 week2.15%−1.25%1.23%
1 month−3.20%−10.79%−4.79%
3 months−5.54%−25.79%−7.87%
6 months−10.18%−22.69%−14.17%
YTD15.41%5.59%10.17%
1 year19.16%8.88%17.96%
3 years86.85%—87.89%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:24.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICF vs MTK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICF (TEB Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MTK (MT Portföy Katılım Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ICF leads in 8 and MTK leads in 2. ICF is a Stock Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MTK is a Stock Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Today (est.): MTK leads (1.64% vs 1.52%). Daily: ICF leads (−0.20% vs −0.27%). 1 week: ICF leads (2.15% vs −1.25%). 1 month: ICF leads (−3.20% vs −10.79%). 3 months: ICF leads (−5.54% vs −25.79%). 6 months: ICF leads (−10.18% vs −22.69%). YTD: ICF leads (15.41% vs 5.59%). 1 year: ICF leads (19.16% vs 8.88%). Size (TRY): MTK leads (19.8M vs 17.5M). Investors: ICF leads (504 vs 471).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICF returned 15.41% and MTK returned 5.59%; over the last year ICF returned 19.16% and MTK returned 8.88%. Over the last month ICF returned −3.20% and MTK returned −10.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, ICF has a size of TRY 17.5M with 504 investors, while MTK has a size of TRY 19.8M with 471 investors. MTK leads in size and ICF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICF is 6 out of 7 and that of MTK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.