ICD vs MD2 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICD (TEB Portföy Dördüncü Değişken Fon) and MD2 (MT Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ICD | MD2 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.50% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | 0.74% | −0.24% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | 2.89% | −6.73% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | 9.44% | −8.44% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 17.14% | 3.91% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 27.64% | 28.27% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 35.66% | 47.52% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 206.99% | — | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ICD vs MD2 Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ICD (TEB Portföy Dördüncü Değişken Fon) and MD2 (MT Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ICD leads in 5 and MD2 leads in 5. ICD is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MD2 is a Variable Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MD2 leads (0.50% vs 0.09%). 1 week: ICD leads (0.74% vs −0.24%). 1 month: ICD leads (2.89% vs −6.73%). 3 months: ICD leads (9.44% vs −8.44%). 6 months: ICD leads (17.14% vs 3.91%). YTD: MD2 leads (28.27% vs 27.64%). 1 year: MD2 leads (47.52% vs 35.66%). Size (TRY): MD2 leads (37.2M vs 34.5M). Investors: MD2 leads (292 vs 184). Risk: ICD leads (2 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ICD or MD2?
Year to date ICD returned 27.64% and MD2 returned 28.27%; over the last year ICD returned 35.66% and MD2 returned 47.52%. Over the last month ICD returned 2.89% and MD2 returned −6.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ICD or MD2?
As of October 22, 2026, ICD has a size of TRY 34.5M with 184 investors, while MD2 has a size of TRY 37.2M with 292 investors. MD2 leads in size and MD2 leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ICD and MD2 mean?
The CMB risk score of ICD is 2 out of 7 and that of MD2 is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.