Yatırımcı.AI

ICC vs KRF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICC (TEB Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

ICCKRF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICC vs KRF Fund Comparison
MetricICCKRFCategory median
Daily0.33%0.09%0.03%
1 week1.34%0.58%0.83%
1 month−0.36%−0.82%−1.16%
3 months−0.64%1.43%−0.11%
6 months0.07%7.85%0.00%
YTD19.33%23.93%22.14%
1 year24.31%29.82%29.37%
3 years152.97%188.01%154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICC vs KRF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICC (TEB Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and KRF (Kare Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ICC leads in 5 and KRF leads in 6. ICC is a Variable Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRF is a Variable Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ICC leads (0.33% vs 0.09%). 1 week: ICC leads (1.34% vs 0.58%). 1 month: ICC leads (−0.36% vs −0.82%). 3 months: KRF leads (1.43% vs −0.64%). 6 months: KRF leads (7.85% vs 0.07%). YTD: KRF leads (23.93% vs 19.33%). 1 year: KRF leads (29.82% vs 24.31%). 3 years: KRF leads (188.01% vs 152.97%). Size (TRY): ICC leads (22.1M vs 21M). Investors: KRF leads (462 vs 265). Risk: ICC leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICC returned 19.33% and KRF returned 23.93%; over the last year ICC returned 24.31% and KRF returned 29.82%. Over the last month ICC returned −0.36% and KRF returned −0.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, ICC has a size of TRY 22.1M with 265 investors, while KRF has a size of TRY 21M with 462 investors. ICC leads in size and KRF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICC is 4 out of 7 and that of KRF is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.