Yatırımcı.AI

ICC vs MAD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ICC (Teb Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and MAD (Meksa Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

ICCMAD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ICC vs MAD Fund Comparison
MetricICCMADCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.78%−2.44%
Daily0.21%0.22%0.32%
1 week−0.13%−0.53%0.42%
1 month−1.33%−5.21%−1.48%
3 months2.14%−8.21%4.48%
6 months12.05%2.39%14.82%
YTD21.39%1.77%25.33%
1 year27.13%5.96%35.72%
3 years161.42%103.67%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 14:31.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ICC vs MAD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ICC (Teb Portföy Beşinci Değişken Fon) and MAD (Meksa Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ICC leads in 9 and MAD leads in 2. ICC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Teb Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MAD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MAD leads (0.22% vs 0.21%). 1 week: ICC leads (−0.13% vs −0.53%). 1 month: ICC leads (−1.33% vs −5.21%). 3 months: ICC leads (2.14% vs −8.21%). 6 months: ICC leads (12.05% vs 2.39%). YTD: ICC leads (21.39% vs 1.77%). 1 year: ICC leads (27.13% vs 5.96%). 3 years: ICC leads (161.42% vs 103.67%). Size (TRY): ICC leads (23.4M vs 23.1M). Investors: MAD leads (325 vs 267). Risk: ICC leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ICC returned 21.39% and MAD returned 1.77%; over the last year ICC returned 27.13% and MAD returned 5.96%. Over the last month ICC returned −1.33% and MAD returned −5.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ICC has a size of TRY 23.4M with 267 investors, while MAD has a size of TRY 23.1M with 325 investors. ICC leads in size and MAD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ICC is 4 out of 7 and that of MAD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.