HVS vs MHH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HVS (HSBC Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MHH (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | HVS | MHH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −3.86% | — | −3.60% |
| Daily | −2.99% | −2.98% | −2.69% |
| 1 week | −7.10% | −6.01% | −6.58% |
| 1 month | −12.22% | −10.16% | −11.73% |
| 3 months | −13.67% | −8.83% | −13.65% |
| 6 months | −12.71% | −10.98% | −12.24% |
| YTD | 12.16% | 8.82% | 6.83% |
| 1 year | 15.89% | 18.40% | 14.14% |
| 3 years | 98.70% | 101.58% | 87.81% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the HVS vs MHH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of HVS (HSBC Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and MHH (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, HVS leads in 2 and MHH leads in 8. HVS is a Stock Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MHH is a Stock Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHH leads (−2.98% vs −2.99%). 1 week: MHH leads (−6.01% vs −7.10%). 1 month: MHH leads (−10.16% vs −12.22%). 3 months: MHH leads (−8.83% vs −13.67%). 6 months: MHH leads (−10.98% vs −12.71%). YTD: HVS leads (12.16% vs 8.82%). 1 year: MHH leads (18.40% vs 15.89%). 3 years: MHH leads (101.58% vs 98.70%). Size (TRY): HVS leads (1.9B vs 1.9B). Investors: MHH leads (50,017 vs 8,943).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, HVS or MHH?
Year to date HVS returned 12.16% and MHH returned 8.82%; over the last year HVS returned 15.89% and MHH returned 18.40%. Over the last month HVS returned −12.22% and MHH returned −10.16%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, HVS or MHH?
As of October 23, 2026, HVS has a size of TRY 1.9B with 8,943 investors, while MHH has a size of TRY 1.9B with 50,017 investors. HVS leads in size and MHH leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of HVS and MHH mean?
The CMB risk score of HVS is — out of 7 and that of MHH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.