Yatırımcı.AI

GED vs HVS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GED (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Sırketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HVS (HSBC Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

GEDHVS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GED vs HVS Fund Comparison
MetricGEDHVSCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.82%−1.32%
Daily−1.52%−2.22%−1.77%
1 week−3.16%−2.77%−2.74%
1 month−3.51%−5.56%−7.45%
3 months0.59%−3.52%−4.07%
6 months10.10%8.89%6.56%
YTD27.12%24.83%18.36%
1 year33.82%23.56%19.84%
3 years132.49%106.57%91.52%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 16:08.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GED vs HVS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GED (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Sırketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HVS (HSBC Portföy Hisse Senedi (TL) Fonu (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GED leads in 8 and HVS leads in 2. GED is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; HVS is a Stock Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GED leads (−1.52% vs −2.22%). 1 week: HVS leads (−2.77% vs −3.16%). 1 month: GED leads (−3.51% vs −5.56%). 3 months: GED leads (0.59% vs −3.52%). 6 months: GED leads (10.10% vs 8.89%). YTD: GED leads (27.12% vs 24.83%). 1 year: GED leads (33.82% vs 23.56%). 3 years: GED leads (132.49% vs 106.57%). Size (TRY): HVS leads (2.4B vs 2.2B). Investors: GED leads (39,754 vs 9,231).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GED returned 27.12% and HVS returned 24.83%; over the last year GED returned 33.82% and HVS returned 23.56%. Over the last month GED returned −3.51% and HVS returned −5.56%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GED has a size of TRY 2.2B with 39,754 investors, while HVS has a size of TRY 2.4B with 9,231 investors. HVS leads in size and GED leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GED is 6 out of 7 and that of HVS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.