Yatırımcı.AI

HFS vs ODV Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

HFSODV
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HFS vs ODV Fund Comparison
MetricHFSODVCategory median
Daily−0.16%−0.04%0.12%
1 week0.88%0.45%0.70%
1 month−3.15%2.44%−1.87%
3 months−1.90%3.40%−0.88%
6 months−2.30%1.55%0.51%
YTD22.25%18.32%20.46%
1 year28.32%26.52%27.26%
3 years—156.51%160.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HFS vs ODV Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HFS (Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. HSBC Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ODV (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, HFS leads in 4 and ODV leads in 5. HFS is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; ODV is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODV leads (−0.04% vs −0.16%). 1 week: HFS leads (0.88% vs 0.45%). 1 month: ODV leads (2.44% vs −3.15%). 3 months: ODV leads (3.40% vs −1.90%). 6 months: ODV leads (1.55% vs −2.30%). YTD: HFS leads (22.25% vs 18.32%). 1 year: HFS leads (28.32% vs 26.52%). Size (TRY): HFS leads (1.9B vs 1.5B). Investors: ODV leads (3,473 vs 2,046).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HFS returned 22.25% and ODV returned 18.32%; over the last year HFS returned 28.32% and ODV returned 26.52%. Over the last month HFS returned −3.15% and ODV returned 2.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, HFS has a size of TRY 1.9B with 2,046 investors, while ODV has a size of TRY 1.5B with 3,473 investors. HFS leads in size and ODV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HFS is 5 out of 7 and that of ODV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.