Yatırımcı.AI

GZN vs TTL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZN (Global Md Portföy Boğaziçi Serbest Fon) and TTL (Tacirler Portföy Kartopu Serbest Fon) side by side.

GZNTTL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GZN vs TTL Fund Comparison
MetricGZNTTLCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.39%−1.86%
Daily1.20%0.42%0.19%
1 week−1.77%−0.24%0.42%
1 month−6.77%−2.70%0.94%
3 months−1.01%0.01%5.89%
6 months26.84%17.12%12.86%
YTD37.23%26.92%18.07%
1 year55.23%32.28%24.44%
3 years190.40%314.20%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:44.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GZN vs TTL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZN (Global Md Portföy Boğaziçi Serbest Fon) and TTL (Tacirler Portföy Kartopu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZN leads in 6 and TTL leads in 4. GZN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TTL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZN leads (1.20% vs 0.42%). 1 week: TTL leads (−0.24% vs −1.77%). 1 month: TTL leads (−2.70% vs −6.77%). 3 months: TTL leads (0.01% vs −1.01%). 6 months: GZN leads (26.84% vs 17.12%). YTD: GZN leads (37.23% vs 26.92%). 1 year: GZN leads (55.23% vs 32.28%). 3 years: TTL leads (314.20% vs 190.40%). Size (TRY): GZN leads (304.9M vs 291.3M). Investors: GZN leads (810 vs 294).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GZN returned 37.23% and TTL returned 26.92%; over the last year GZN returned 55.23% and TTL returned 32.28%. Over the last month GZN returned −6.77% and TTL returned −2.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GZN has a size of TRY 304.9M with 810 investors, while TTL has a size of TRY 291.3M with 294 investors. GZN leads in size and GZN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZN is 7 out of 7 and that of TTL is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.