GZM vs VPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and VPS (Vega Portföy Salur Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZM | VPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 5.39% | 1.05% | 1.35% |
| Daily | 0.54% | −3.05% | 0.16% |
| 1 week | 1.42% | −3.00% | 0.46% |
| 1 month | 4.21% | −9.68% | 1.10% |
| 3 months | 13.93% | −24.62% | 3.53% |
| 6 months | 34.82% | −53.76% | 8.53% |
| YTD | 77.55% | −34.55% | 16.18% |
| 1 year | 67.43% | — | 19.94% |
| 3 years | 67.68% | — | 103.56% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZM vs VPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and VPS (Vega Portföy Salur Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZM leads in 7 and VPS leads in 3. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Vega Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Today (est.): GZM leads (5.39% vs 1.05%). Daily: GZM leads (0.54% vs −3.05%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.42% vs −3.00%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.21% vs −9.68%). 3 months: GZM leads (13.93% vs −24.62%). 6 months: GZM leads (34.82% vs −53.76%). YTD: GZM leads (77.55% vs −34.55%). Size (TRY): VPS leads (573M vs 548.7M). Investors: VPS leads (4,122 vs 886). Risk: VPS leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZM or VPS?
Year to date GZM returned 77.55% and VPS returned −34.55%; over the last year GZM returned 67.43% and VPS returned —. Over the last month GZM returned 4.21% and VPS returned −9.68%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZM or VPS?
As of November 2, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 548.7M with 886 investors, while VPS has a size of TRY 573M with 4,122 investors. VPS leads in size and VPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZM and VPS mean?
The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of VPS is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.