GZG vs VVU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZG | VVU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.07% | −0.86% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | 2.23% | −1.75% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −2.09% | −3.81% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | 3.34% | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 23.76% | 3.81% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 31.73% | 30.14% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 39.51% | 40.32% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 135.47% | 181.63% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZG vs VVU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVU (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZG leads in 7 and VVU leads in 4. GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVU is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZG leads (−0.07% vs −0.86%). 1 week: GZG leads (2.23% vs −1.75%). 1 month: GZG leads (−2.09% vs −3.81%). 3 months: GZG leads (3.34% vs 1.28%). 6 months: GZG leads (23.76% vs 3.81%). YTD: GZG leads (31.73% vs 30.14%). 1 year: VVU leads (40.32% vs 39.51%). 3 years: VVU leads (181.63% vs 135.47%). Size (TRY): GZG leads (360.6M vs 351.6M). Investors: VVU leads (5,619 vs 3,611). Risk: VVU leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZG or VVU?
Year to date GZG returned 31.73% and VVU returned 30.14%; over the last year GZG returned 39.51% and VVU returned 40.32%. Over the last month GZG returned −2.09% and VVU returned −3.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZG or VVU?
As of October 22, 2026, GZG has a size of TRY 360.6M with 3,611 investors, while VVU has a size of TRY 351.6M with 5,619 investors. GZG leads in size and VVU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZG and VVU mean?
The CMB risk score of GZG is 6 out of 7 and that of VVU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.