GZG vs URA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZG | URA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.49% | 4.41% | 1.07% |
| 1 week | 2.29% | 2.18% | 2.38% |
| 1 month | 8.95% | −7.88% | −0.76% |
| 3 months | 6.36% | −15.66% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 25.88% | −22.02% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 39.62% | 3.89% | 22.39% |
| 1 year | 48.09% | 2.88% | 28.39% |
| 3 years | 147.42% | — | 154.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZG vs URA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GZG leads in 7 and URA leads in 2. GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; URA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: URA leads (4.41% vs 1.49%). 1 week: GZG leads (2.29% vs 2.18%). 1 month: GZG leads (8.95% vs −7.88%). 3 months: GZG leads (6.36% vs −15.66%). 6 months: GZG leads (25.88% vs −22.02%). YTD: GZG leads (39.62% vs 3.89%). 1 year: GZG leads (48.09% vs 2.88%). Size (TRY): GZG leads (378.3M vs 366.7M). Investors: URA leads (6,439 vs 3,583).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZG or URA?
Year to date GZG returned 39.62% and URA returned 3.89%; over the last year GZG returned 48.09% and URA returned 2.88%. Over the last month GZG returned 8.95% and URA returned −7.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZG or URA?
As of November 10, 2026, GZG has a size of TRY 378.3M with 3,583 investors, while URA has a size of TRY 366.7M with 6,439 investors. GZG leads in size and URA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZG and URA mean?
The CMB risk score of GZG is 6 out of 7 and that of URA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.