Yatırımcı.AI

GHZ vs URA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.

GHZURA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHZ vs URA Fund Comparison
MetricGHZURACategory median
Daily0.09%4.41%1.07%
1 week0.62%2.18%2.38%
1 month2.98%−7.88%−0.76%
3 months8.78%−15.66%0.00%
6 months19.02%−22.02%0.00%
YTD34.96%3.89%22.39%
1 year41.83%2.88%28.39%
3 years201.07%—154.30%
Returns are based on prices as of November 10, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHZ vs URA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GHZ leads in 8 and URA leads in 2. GHZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; URA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: URA leads (4.41% vs 0.09%). 1 week: URA leads (2.18% vs 0.62%). 1 month: GHZ leads (2.98% vs −7.88%). 3 months: GHZ leads (8.78% vs −15.66%). 6 months: GHZ leads (19.02% vs −22.02%). YTD: GHZ leads (34.96% vs 3.89%). 1 year: GHZ leads (41.83% vs 2.88%). Size (TRY): GHZ leads (369.7M vs 366.7M). Investors: GHZ leads (7,733 vs 6,439). Risk: GHZ leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHZ returned 34.96% and URA returned 3.89%; over the last year GHZ returned 41.83% and URA returned 2.88%. Over the last month GHZ returned 2.98% and URA returned −7.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 10, 2026, GHZ has a size of TRY 369.7M with 7,733 investors, while URA has a size of TRY 366.7M with 6,439 investors. GHZ leads in size and GHZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHZ is 2 out of 7 and that of URA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.