Yatırımcı.AI

GTF vs MBR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTF (Azimut PYŞ Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

GTFMBR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GTF vs MBR Fund Comparison
MetricGTFMBRCategory median
Daily−0.12%−0.22%−0.05%
1 week0.14%−0.37%0.19%
1 month1.67%0.79%1.73%
3 months6.23%11.91%7.51%
6 months16.14%25.23%19.07%
YTD21.04%40.45%22.38%
1 year35.88%53.69%36.86%
3 years181.37%—176.00%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GTF vs MBR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GTF (Azimut PYŞ Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GTF leads in 5 and MBR leads in 4. GTF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MBR is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GTF leads (−0.12% vs −0.22%). 1 week: GTF leads (0.14% vs −0.37%). 1 month: GTF leads (1.67% vs 0.79%). 3 months: MBR leads (11.91% vs 6.23%). 6 months: MBR leads (25.23% vs 16.14%). YTD: MBR leads (40.45% vs 21.04%). 1 year: MBR leads (53.69% vs 35.88%). Size (TRY): GTF leads (141.7M vs 129.3M). Investors: GTF leads (470 vs 302).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GTF returned 21.04% and MBR returned 40.45%; over the last year GTF returned 35.88% and MBR returned 53.69%. Over the last month GTF returned 1.67% and MBR returned 0.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, GTF has a size of TRY 141.7M with 470 investors, while MBR has a size of TRY 129.3M with 302 investors. GTF leads in size and GTF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GTF is 3 out of 7 and that of MBR is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.