Yatırımcı.AI

GTF vs YVB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTF (Azimut Pyş Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and YVB (Yapı Kredi Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

GTFYVB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GTF vs YVB Fund Comparison
MetricGTFYVBCategory median
Daily0.21%0.17%0.24%
1 week0.45%0.08%0.61%
1 month1.79%0.54%1.60%
3 months6.35%5.60%7.35%
6 months16.51%15.10%18.12%
YTD20.78%8.97%20.27%
1 year36.04%25.07%35.25%
3 years182.00%—164.38%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GTF vs YVB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GTF (Azimut Pyş Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and YVB (Yapı Kredi Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GTF leads in 9 and YVB leads in 1. GTF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YVB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GTF leads (0.21% vs 0.17%). 1 week: GTF leads (0.45% vs 0.08%). 1 month: GTF leads (1.79% vs 0.54%). 3 months: GTF leads (6.35% vs 5.60%). 6 months: GTF leads (16.51% vs 15.10%). YTD: GTF leads (20.78% vs 8.97%). 1 year: GTF leads (36.04% vs 25.07%). Size (TRY): GTF leads (141.9M vs 121.8M). Investors: YVB leads (718 vs 470). Risk: GTF leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GTF returned 20.78% and YVB returned 8.97%; over the last year GTF returned 36.04% and YVB returned 25.07%. Over the last month GTF returned 1.79% and YVB returned 0.54%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GTF has a size of TRY 141.9M with 470 investors, while YVB has a size of TRY 121.8M with 718 investors. GTF leads in size and YVB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GTF is 3 out of 7 and that of YVB is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.