Yatırımcı.AI

GPU vs JET Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and JET (Ata Portföy Havacılık ve Savunma Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GPUJET
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPU vs JET Fund Comparison
MetricGPUJETCategory median
Daily−1.32%−1.16%−1.35%
1 week−2.34%−1.33%−2.09%
1 month−3.40%−4.67%−4.70%
3 months0.36%−4.42%−1.44%
6 months4.91%−4.68%2.69%
YTD21.41%10.11%20.04%
1 year30.15%12.19%28.83%
3 years202.85%46.76%156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPU vs JET Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and JET (Ata Portföy Havacılık ve Savunma Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPU leads in 7 and JET leads in 4. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; JET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: JET leads (−1.16% vs −1.32%). 1 week: JET leads (−1.33% vs −2.34%). 1 month: GPU leads (−3.40% vs −4.67%). 3 months: GPU leads (0.36% vs −4.42%). 6 months: GPU leads (4.91% vs −4.68%). YTD: GPU leads (21.41% vs 10.11%). 1 year: GPU leads (30.15% vs 12.19%). 3 years: GPU leads (202.85% vs 46.76%). Size (TRY): JET leads (348.5M vs 329.9M). Investors: JET leads (14,172 vs 2,281). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPU returned 21.41% and JET returned 10.11%; over the last year GPU returned 30.15% and JET returned 12.19%. Over the last month GPU returned −3.40% and JET returned −4.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 329.9M with 2,281 investors, while JET has a size of TRY 348.5M with 14,172 investors. JET leads in size and JET leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of JET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.