Yatırımcı.AI

GPU vs GZL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.

GPUGZL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GPU vs GZL Fund Comparison
MetricGPUGZLCategory median
Daily0.55%−0.09%0.32%
1 week0.53%−1.75%0.42%
1 month−0.68%−3.01%−1.48%
3 months5.03%2.40%4.48%
6 months14.85%11.89%14.82%
YTD25.33%32.54%25.33%
1 year36.42%42.46%35.72%
3 years214.55%83.47%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GPU vs GZL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPU leads in 7 and GZL leads in 4. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPU leads (0.55% vs −0.09%). 1 week: GPU leads (0.53% vs −1.75%). 1 month: GPU leads (−0.68% vs −3.01%). 3 months: GPU leads (5.03% vs 2.40%). 6 months: GPU leads (14.85% vs 11.89%). YTD: GZL leads (32.54% vs 25.33%). 1 year: GZL leads (42.46% vs 36.42%). 3 years: GPU leads (214.55% vs 83.47%). Size (TRY): GZL leads (363.9M vs 353.5M). Investors: GZL leads (6,055 vs 2,380). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GPU returned 25.33% and GZL returned 32.54%; over the last year GPU returned 36.42% and GZL returned 42.46%. Over the last month GPU returned −0.68% and GZL returned −3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 353.5M with 2,380 investors, while GZL has a size of TRY 363.9M with 6,055 investors. GZL leads in size and GZL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of GZL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.