GZL vs VVU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) and VVU (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GZL | VVU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.09% | 0.56% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −1.75% | 0.39% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −3.01% | −2.95% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 2.40% | 9.55% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 11.89% | 16.57% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 32.54% | 34.58% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 42.46% | 43.51% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 83.47% | 174.57% | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GZL vs VVU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GZL (Garanti Portföy Tarım ve Gıda Sektörü Değişken Fon) and VVU (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GZL leads in 1 and VVU leads in 9. GZL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: VVU leads (0.56% vs −0.09%). 1 week: VVU leads (0.39% vs −1.75%). 1 month: VVU leads (−2.95% vs −3.01%). 3 months: VVU leads (9.55% vs 2.40%). 6 months: VVU leads (16.57% vs 11.89%). YTD: VVU leads (34.58% vs 32.54%). 1 year: VVU leads (43.51% vs 42.46%). 3 years: VVU leads (174.57% vs 83.47%). Size (TRY): VVU leads (370.7M vs 363.9M). Investors: GZL leads (6,055 vs 5,684).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GZL or VVU?
Year to date GZL returned 32.54% and VVU returned 34.58%; over the last year GZL returned 42.46% and VVU returned 43.51%. Over the last month GZL returned −3.01% and VVU returned −2.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GZL or VVU?
As of September 28, 2026, GZL has a size of TRY 363.9M with 6,055 investors, while VVU has a size of TRY 370.7M with 5,684 investors. VVU leads in size and GZL leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GZL and VVU mean?
The CMB risk score of GZL is 5 out of 7 and that of VVU is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.