GPU vs GZG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GPU | GZG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.32% | −0.30% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −2.34% | 0.15% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −3.40% | −2.82% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | 0.36% | 2.82% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 4.91% | 23.40% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 21.41% | 31.34% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 30.15% | 39.21% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 202.85% | 134.77% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GPU vs GZG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GPU leads in 2 and GZG leads in 9. GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZG leads (−0.30% vs −1.32%). 1 week: GZG leads (0.15% vs −2.34%). 1 month: GZG leads (−2.82% vs −3.40%). 3 months: GZG leads (2.82% vs 0.36%). 6 months: GZG leads (23.40% vs 4.91%). YTD: GZG leads (31.34% vs 21.41%). 1 year: GZG leads (39.21% vs 30.15%). 3 years: GPU leads (202.85% vs 134.77%). Size (TRY): GZG leads (358.8M vs 329.9M). Investors: GZG leads (3,576 vs 2,281). Risk: GPU leads (4 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GPU or GZG?
Year to date GPU returned 21.41% and GZG returned 31.34%; over the last year GPU returned 30.15% and GZG returned 39.21%. Over the last month GPU returned −3.40% and GZG returned −2.82%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GPU or GZG?
As of October 23, 2026, GPU has a size of TRY 329.9M with 2,281 investors, while GZG has a size of TRY 358.8M with 3,576 investors. GZG leads in size and GZG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GPU and GZG mean?
The CMB risk score of GPU is 4 out of 7 and that of GZG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.