Yatırımcı.AI

GOL vs PPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GOL (Garanti Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) side by side.

GOLPPG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GOL vs PPG Fund Comparison
MetricGOLPPGCategory median
Daily−0.61%0.09%0.09%
1 week0.66%0.65%0.62%
1 month−1.42%2.97%−0.73%
3 months−2.56%9.26%0.80%
6 months−4.91%20.27%5.53%
YTD3.74%37.32%29.43%
1 year10.12%44.34%35.02%
3 years53.16%—171.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GOL vs PPG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GOL (Garanti Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) and PPG (Albaraka Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GOL leads in 3 and PPG leads in 7. GOL is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPG is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPG leads (0.09% vs −0.61%). 1 week: GOL leads (0.66% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PPG leads (2.97% vs −1.42%). 3 months: PPG leads (9.26% vs −2.56%). 6 months: PPG leads (20.27% vs −4.91%). YTD: PPG leads (37.32% vs 3.74%). 1 year: PPG leads (44.34% vs 10.12%). Size (TRY): GOL leads (4.3B vs 2.5B). Investors: GOL leads (10,848 vs 1,919). Risk: PPG leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GOL returned 3.74% and PPG returned 37.32%; over the last year GOL returned 10.12% and PPG returned 44.34%. Over the last month GOL returned −1.42% and PPG returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, GOL has a size of TRY 4.3B with 10,848 investors, while PPG has a size of TRY 2.5B with 1,919 investors. GOL leads in size and GOL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GOL is 6 out of 7 and that of PPG is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.