Yatırımcı.AI

GMD vs IUH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IUH (Inveo Portföy Dönüştürücü Teknolojiler Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GMDIUH
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GMD vs IUH Fund Comparison
MetricGMDIUHCategory median
Daily0.45%0.73%0.38%
1 week0.04%1.74%0.25%
1 month−1.83%−0.47%−1.05%
3 months0.54%4.19%6.44%
6 months14.02%37.42%13.81%
YTD19.22%42.55%22.40%
1 year26.97%49.79%35.81%
3 years36.81%229.04%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GMD vs IUH comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IUH (Inveo Portföy Dönüştürücü Teknolojiler Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GMD leads in 1 and IUH leads in 9. GMD is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IUH is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IUH leads (0.73% vs 0.45%). 1 week: IUH leads (1.74% vs 0.04%). 1 month: IUH leads (−0.47% vs −1.83%). 3 months: IUH leads (4.19% vs 0.54%). 6 months: IUH leads (37.42% vs 14.02%). YTD: IUH leads (42.55% vs 19.22%). 1 year: IUH leads (49.79% vs 26.97%). 3 years: IUH leads (229.04% vs 36.81%). Size (TRY): GMD leads (15.1M vs 9.1M). Investors: IUH leads (648 vs 97).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GMD returned 19.22% and IUH returned 42.55%; over the last year GMD returned 26.97% and IUH returned 49.79%. Over the last month GMD returned −1.83% and IUH returned −0.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GMD has a size of TRY 15.1M with 97 investors, while IUH has a size of TRY 9.1M with 648 investors. GMD leads in size and IUH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMD is 5 out of 7 and that of IUH is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.