Yatırımcı.AI

GMC vs TCF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TCF (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GMCTCF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GMC vs TCF Fund Comparison
MetricGMCTCFCategory median
Daily−0.39%0.10%−0.33%
1 week1.26%0.55%−0.80%
1 month−12.72%2.39%−2.70%
3 months1.55%8.86%1.63%
6 months−22.67%18.27%4.14%
YTD−16.80%33.58%20.92%
1 year29.81%43.71%30.34%
3 years281.71%236.32%165.29%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GMC vs TCF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMC (TEB Portföy Gümüş Fon Sepeti Fonu) and TCF (TEB Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GMC leads in 4 and TCF leads in 7. GMC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TCF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TCF leads (0.10% vs −0.39%). 1 week: GMC leads (1.26% vs 0.55%). 1 month: TCF leads (2.39% vs −12.72%). 3 months: TCF leads (8.86% vs 1.55%). 6 months: TCF leads (18.27% vs −22.67%). YTD: TCF leads (33.58% vs −16.80%). 1 year: TCF leads (43.71% vs 29.81%). 3 years: GMC leads (281.71% vs 236.32%). Size (TRY): GMC leads (3.3B vs 3B). Investors: GMC leads (18,536 vs 2,427). Risk: TCF leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GMC returned −16.80% and TCF returned 33.58%; over the last year GMC returned 29.81% and TCF returned 43.71%. Over the last month GMC returned −12.72% and TCF returned 2.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GMC has a size of TRY 3.3B with 18,536 investors, while TCF has a size of TRY 3B with 2,427 investors. GMC leads in size and GMC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMC is 7 out of 7 and that of TCF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.