GLC vs NHP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLC (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NHP (Neo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLC | NHP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.17% | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| 1 week | −0.39% | −0.11% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | −2.52% | −0.00% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 4.52% | 2.39% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | 8.72% | 11.35% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 7.68% | 17.19% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 16.53% | 29.32% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 142.65% | 165.01% | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLC vs NHP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GLC (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NHP (Neo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GLC leads in 2 and NHP leads in 9. GLC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktıf Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NHP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHP leads (0.35% vs 0.17%). 1 week: NHP leads (−0.11% vs −0.39%). 1 month: NHP leads (0.00% vs −2.52%). 3 months: GLC leads (4.52% vs 2.39%). 6 months: NHP leads (11.35% vs 8.72%). YTD: NHP leads (17.19% vs 7.68%). 1 year: NHP leads (29.32% vs 16.53%). 3 years: NHP leads (165.01% vs 142.65%). Size (TRY): GLC leads (16.4M vs 11M). Investors: NHP leads (125 vs 60). Risk: NHP leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GLC or NHP?
Year to date GLC returned 7.68% and NHP returned 17.19%; over the last year GLC returned 16.53% and NHP returned 29.32%. Over the last month GLC returned −2.52% and NHP returned 0.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GLC or NHP?
As of September 28, 2026, GLC has a size of TRY 16.4M with 60 investors, while NHP has a size of TRY 11M with 125 investors. GLC leads in size and NHP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GLC and NHP mean?
The CMB risk score of GLC is 5 out of 7 and that of NHP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.