Yatırımcı.AI

GLC vs GMD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GLC (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GLCGMD
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GLC vs GMD Fund Comparison
MetricGLCGMDCategory median
Daily0.17%0.45%0.38%
1 week−0.39%0.04%0.25%
1 month−2.52%−1.83%−1.05%
3 months4.52%0.54%6.44%
6 months8.72%14.02%13.81%
YTD7.68%19.22%22.40%
1 year16.53%26.97%35.81%
3 years142.65%36.81%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GLC vs GMD comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GLC (Aktif Portföy Üçüncü Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GLC leads in 3 and GMD leads in 7. GLC is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Aktıf Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GMD is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GMD leads (0.45% vs 0.17%). 1 week: GMD leads (0.04% vs −0.39%). 1 month: GMD leads (−1.83% vs −2.52%). 3 months: GLC leads (4.52% vs 0.54%). 6 months: GMD leads (14.02% vs 8.72%). YTD: GMD leads (19.22% vs 7.68%). 1 year: GMD leads (26.97% vs 16.53%). 3 years: GLC leads (142.65% vs 36.81%). Size (TRY): GLC leads (16.4M vs 15.1M). Investors: GMD leads (97 vs 60).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GLC returned 7.68% and GMD returned 19.22%; over the last year GLC returned 16.53% and GMD returned 26.97%. Over the last month GLC returned −2.52% and GMD returned −1.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GLC has a size of TRY 16.4M with 60 investors, while GMD has a size of TRY 15.1M with 97 investors. GLC leads in size and GMD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GLC is 5 out of 7 and that of GMD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.