Yatırımcı.AI

GMD vs NHP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NHP (Neo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GMDNHP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GMD vs NHP Fund Comparison
MetricGMDNHPCategory median
Daily0.45%0.35%0.36%
1 week0.04%−0.11%0.23%
1 month−1.83%−0.01%−1.05%
3 months0.54%2.39%6.35%
6 months14.02%11.35%13.81%
YTD19.22%17.19%22.40%
1 year26.97%29.32%35.81%
3 years36.81%165.01%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GMD vs NHP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GMD (Global Md Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NHP (Neo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GMD leads in 5 and NHP leads in 6. GMD is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NHP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GMD leads (0.45% vs 0.35%). 1 week: GMD leads (0.04% vs −0.11%). 1 month: NHP leads (−0.01% vs −1.83%). 3 months: NHP leads (2.39% vs 0.54%). 6 months: GMD leads (14.02% vs 11.35%). YTD: GMD leads (19.22% vs 17.19%). 1 year: NHP leads (29.32% vs 26.97%). 3 years: NHP leads (165.01% vs 36.81%). Size (TRY): GMD leads (15.1M vs 11M). Investors: NHP leads (125 vs 97). Risk: NHP leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GMD returned 19.22% and NHP returned 17.19%; over the last year GMD returned 26.97% and NHP returned 29.32%. Over the last month GMD returned −1.83% and NHP returned −0.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GMD has a size of TRY 15.1M with 97 investors, while NHP has a size of TRY 11M with 125 investors. GMD leads in size and NHP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GMD is 5 out of 7 and that of NHP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.