Yatırımcı.AI

GKH vs KNI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GKH (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

GKHKNI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GKH vs KNI Fund Comparison
MetricGKHKNICategory median
Daily0.08%0.08%0.05%
1 week0.68%0.63%0.44%
1 month2.87%2.73%0.38%
3 months9.54%9.22%3.95%
6 months20.51%19.80%8.45%
YTD34.75%33.61%16.06%
1 year44.71%43.23%20.98%
3 years240.35%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GKH vs KNI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GKH (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and KNI (Azimut Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GKH leads in 8 and KNI leads in 1. GKH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KNI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GKH leads (0.08% vs 0.08%). 1 week: GKH leads (0.68% vs 0.63%). 1 month: GKH leads (2.87% vs 2.73%). 3 months: GKH leads (9.54% vs 9.22%). 6 months: GKH leads (20.51% vs 19.80%). YTD: GKH leads (34.75% vs 33.61%). 1 year: GKH leads (44.71% vs 43.23%). Size (TRY): KNI leads (3.5B vs 3.3B). Investors: GKH leads (1,928 vs 399).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GKH returned 34.75% and KNI returned 33.61%; over the last year GKH returned 44.71% and KNI returned 43.23%. Over the last month GKH returned 2.87% and KNI returned 2.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GKH has a size of TRY 3.3B with 1,928 investors, while KNI has a size of TRY 3.5B with 399 investors. KNI leads in size and GKH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GKH is 2 out of 7 and that of KNI is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.