Yatırımcı.AI

GJB vs PFO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PFO (Phillip Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

GJBPFO
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GJB vs PFO Fund Comparison
MetricGJBPFOCategory median
Daily0.76%−0.30%0.38%
1 week0.41%−7.25%0.25%
1 month−3.04%−7.00%−1.05%
3 months−1.78%−1.35%6.44%
6 months11.64%−0.31%13.81%
YTD20.06%11.65%22.40%
1 year41.14%22.83%35.81%
3 years155.68%42.43%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GJB vs PFO comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and PFO (Phillip Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GJB leads in 8 and PFO leads in 3. GJB is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PFO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GJB leads (0.76% vs −0.30%). 1 week: GJB leads (0.41% vs −7.25%). 1 month: GJB leads (−3.04% vs −7.00%). 3 months: PFO leads (−1.35% vs −1.78%). 6 months: GJB leads (11.64% vs −0.31%). YTD: GJB leads (20.06% vs 11.65%). 1 year: GJB leads (41.14% vs 22.83%). 3 years: GJB leads (155.68% vs 42.43%). Size (TRY): PFO leads (68.9M vs 68.4M). Investors: GJB leads (815 vs 263). Risk: PFO leads (4 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GJB returned 20.06% and PFO returned 11.65%; over the last year GJB returned 41.14% and PFO returned 22.83%. Over the last month GJB returned −3.04% and PFO returned −7.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GJB has a size of TRY 68.4M with 815 investors, while PFO has a size of TRY 68.9M with 263 investors. PFO leads in size and GJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GJB is 5 out of 7 and that of PFO is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.