GJB vs IAM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GJB | IAM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.76% | 0.09% | 0.36% |
| 1 week | 0.41% | −0.18% | 0.23% |
| 1 month | −3.04% | −2.51% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | −1.78% | 1.59% | 6.35% |
| 6 months | 11.64% | 13.84% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 20.06% | 15.84% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 41.14% | 26.28% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 155.68% | 10.12% | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GJB vs IAM comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GJB (Inveo Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GJB leads in 5 and IAM leads in 5. GJB is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IAM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GJB leads (0.76% vs 0.09%). 1 week: GJB leads (0.41% vs −0.18%). 1 month: IAM leads (−2.51% vs −3.04%). 3 months: IAM leads (1.59% vs −1.78%). 6 months: IAM leads (13.84% vs 11.64%). YTD: GJB leads (20.06% vs 15.84%). 1 year: GJB leads (41.14% vs 26.28%). 3 years: GJB leads (155.68% vs 10.12%). Size (TRY): IAM leads (74.8M vs 68.4M). Investors: IAM leads (2,673 vs 815).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GJB or IAM?
Year to date GJB returned 20.06% and IAM returned 15.84%; over the last year GJB returned 41.14% and IAM returned 26.28%. Over the last month GJB returned −3.04% and IAM returned −2.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GJB or IAM?
As of September 28, 2026, GJB has a size of TRY 68.4M with 815 investors, while IAM has a size of TRY 74.8M with 2,673 investors. IAM leads in size and IAM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GJB and IAM mean?
The CMB risk score of GJB is 5 out of 7 and that of IAM is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.