Yatırımcı.AI

GHZ vs GPU Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.

GHZGPU
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHZ vs GPU Fund Comparison
MetricGHZGPUCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.57%−0.41%
1 week0.70%−0.88%−1.69%
1 month2.84%−1.80%−3.34%
3 months8.95%2.27%0.00%
6 months19.19%6.32%4.10%
YTD32.65%23.04%21.58%
1 year42.07%32.00%30.90%
3 years199.70%206.91%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHZ vs GPU Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHZ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GPU (Garanti Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHZ leads in 10 and GPU leads in 1. GHZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GPU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GHZ leads (0.09% vs −0.57%). 1 week: GHZ leads (0.70% vs −0.88%). 1 month: GHZ leads (2.84% vs −1.80%). 3 months: GHZ leads (8.95% vs 2.27%). 6 months: GHZ leads (19.19% vs 6.32%). YTD: GHZ leads (32.65% vs 23.04%). 1 year: GHZ leads (42.07% vs 32.00%). 3 years: GPU leads (206.91% vs 199.70%). Size (TRY): GHZ leads (344.5M vs 334.5M). Investors: GHZ leads (7,640 vs 2,290). Risk: GHZ leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHZ returned 32.65% and GPU returned 23.04%; over the last year GHZ returned 42.07% and GPU returned 32.00%. Over the last month GHZ returned 2.84% and GPU returned −1.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GHZ has a size of TRY 344.5M with 7,640 investors, while GPU has a size of TRY 334.5M with 2,290 investors. GHZ leads in size and GHZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHZ is 2 out of 7 and that of GPU is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.