Yatırımcı.AI

GHV vs VVD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHV (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GHVVVD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHV vs VVD Fund Comparison
MetricGHVVVDCategory median
Daily0.12%−2.01%−1.30%
1 week0.66%−4.42%−2.06%
1 month2.84%−8.04%−4.70%
3 months9.01%−3.49%−1.44%
6 months19.34%−3.07%2.69%
YTD32.89%21.06%20.08%
1 year42.47%28.42%28.83%
3 years177.69%161.71%156.57%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHV vs VVD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHV (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHV leads in 10 and VVD leads in 1. GHV is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; VVD is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GHV leads (0.12% vs −2.01%). 1 week: GHV leads (0.66% vs −4.42%). 1 month: GHV leads (2.84% vs −8.04%). 3 months: GHV leads (9.01% vs −3.49%). 6 months: GHV leads (19.34% vs −3.07%). YTD: GHV leads (32.89% vs 21.06%). 1 year: GHV leads (42.47% vs 28.42%). 3 years: GHV leads (177.69% vs 161.71%). Size (TRY): VVD leads (430.9M vs 422.9M). Investors: GHV leads (9,401 vs 6,838). Risk: GHV leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHV returned 32.89% and VVD returned 21.06%; over the last year GHV returned 42.47% and VVD returned 28.42%. Over the last month GHV returned 2.84% and VVD returned −8.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GHV has a size of TRY 422.9M with 9,401 investors, while VVD has a size of TRY 430.9M with 6,838 investors. VVD leads in size and GHV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHV is 3 out of 7 and that of VVD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.