VVD vs VVM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of VVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | VVD | VVM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.10% | −0.02% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.46% | 0.23% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −6.68% | 1.29% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −0.61% | 7.63% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −1.08% | 15.16% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 23.55% | 31.37% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 32.03% | 42.39% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 167.08% | 234.75% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the VVD vs VVM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of VVD (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, VVD leads in 0 and VVM leads in 11. VVD is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; VVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: VVM leads (−0.02% vs −1.10%). 1 week: VVM leads (0.23% vs −2.46%). 1 month: VVM leads (1.29% vs −6.68%). 3 months: VVM leads (7.63% vs −0.61%). 6 months: VVM leads (15.16% vs −1.08%). YTD: VVM leads (31.37% vs 23.55%). 1 year: VVM leads (42.39% vs 32.03%). 3 years: VVM leads (234.75% vs 167.08%). Size (TRY): VVM leads (445.1M vs 441.5M). Investors: VVM leads (7,067 vs 6,848). Risk: VVM leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, VVD or VVM?
Year to date VVD returned 23.55% and VVM returned 31.37%; over the last year VVD returned 32.03% and VVM returned 42.39%. Over the last month VVD returned −6.68% and VVM returned 1.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, VVD or VVM?
As of October 22, 2026, VVD has a size of TRY 441.5M with 6,848 investors, while VVM has a size of TRY 445.1M with 7,067 investors. VVM leads in size and VVM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of VVD and VVM mean?
The CMB risk score of VVD is 5 out of 7 and that of VVM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.