Yatırımcı.AI

GHP vs YZC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHP (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZC (Yapı Kredi Portföy Fintech ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GHPYZC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHP vs YZC Fund Comparison
MetricGHPYZCCategory median
Daily0.03%−3.27%−1.41%
1 week0.43%−1.96%−0.69%
1 month1.88%−8.95%−3.96%
3 months8.39%1.95%−1.43%
6 months18.73%12.88%1.85%
YTD33.81%35.29%17.97%
1 year42.85%32.56%23.69%
3 years272.41%315.22%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHP vs YZC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHP (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YZC (Yapı Kredi Portföy Fintech ve Blockchain Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHP leads in 7 and YZC leads in 4. GHP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; YZC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GHP leads (0.03% vs −3.27%). 1 week: GHP leads (0.43% vs −1.96%). 1 month: GHP leads (1.88% vs −8.95%). 3 months: GHP leads (8.39% vs 1.95%). 6 months: GHP leads (18.73% vs 12.88%). YTD: YZC leads (35.29% vs 33.81%). 1 year: GHP leads (42.85% vs 32.56%). 3 years: YZC leads (315.22% vs 272.41%). Size (TRY): YZC leads (593.9M vs 573.4M). Investors: YZC leads (11,409 vs 7,081). Risk: GHP leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHP returned 33.81% and YZC returned 35.29%; over the last year GHP returned 42.85% and YZC returned 32.56%. Over the last month GHP returned 1.88% and YZC returned −8.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, GHP has a size of TRY 573.4M with 7,081 investors, while YZC has a size of TRY 593.9M with 11,409 investors. YZC leads in size and YZC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHP is 2 out of 7 and that of YZC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.