GHP vs SUC Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHP (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GHP | SUC | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.14% | −0.06% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | 0.25% | −1.11% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | 2.52% | −1.90% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | 9.96% | 5.84% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 18.25% | 14.87% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 33.27% | 26.66% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 44.42% | 36.54% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 281.15% | 212.88% | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GHP vs SUC Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GHP (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and SUC (Ünlü Portföy Üçüncü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHP leads in 9 and SUC leads in 2. GHP is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; SUC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SUC leads (−0.06% vs −0.14%). 1 week: GHP leads (0.25% vs −1.11%). 1 month: GHP leads (2.52% vs −1.90%). 3 months: GHP leads (9.96% vs 5.84%). 6 months: GHP leads (18.25% vs 14.87%). YTD: GHP leads (33.27% vs 26.66%). 1 year: GHP leads (44.42% vs 36.54%). 3 years: GHP leads (281.15% vs 212.88%). Size (TRY): SUC leads (571.2M vs 563.7M). Investors: GHP leads (7,043 vs 421). Risk: GHP leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GHP or SUC?
Year to date GHP returned 33.27% and SUC returned 26.66%; over the last year GHP returned 44.42% and SUC returned 36.54%. Over the last month GHP returned 2.52% and SUC returned −1.90%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GHP or SUC?
As of October 22, 2026, GHP has a size of TRY 563.7M with 7,043 investors, while SUC has a size of TRY 571.2M with 421 investors. SUC leads in size and GHP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GHP and SUC mean?
The CMB risk score of GHP is 2 out of 7 and that of SUC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.