Yatırımcı.AI

GHM vs ZDD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GHM (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) side by side.

GHMZDD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GHM vs ZDD Fund Comparison
MetricGHMZDDCategory median
Daily−1.43%−0.20%−0.41%
1 week−2.56%−0.44%−1.69%
1 month−5.40%0.62%−3.34%
3 months−3.34%6.14%0.00%
6 months−0.37%12.20%4.10%
YTD21.37%26.02%21.58%
1 year34.98%36.34%30.90%
3 years162.10%200.74%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GHM vs ZDD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GHM (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZDD (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GHM leads in 2 and ZDD leads in 9. GHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; ZDD is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZDD leads (−0.20% vs −1.43%). 1 week: ZDD leads (−0.44% vs −2.56%). 1 month: ZDD leads (0.62% vs −5.40%). 3 months: ZDD leads (6.14% vs −3.34%). 6 months: ZDD leads (12.20% vs −0.37%). YTD: ZDD leads (26.02% vs 21.37%). 1 year: ZDD leads (36.34% vs 34.98%). 3 years: ZDD leads (200.74% vs 162.10%). Size (TRY): GHM leads (531.9M vs 522.1M). Investors: GHM leads (7,130 vs 1,361). Risk: ZDD leads (4 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GHM returned 21.37% and ZDD returned 26.02%; over the last year GHM returned 34.98% and ZDD returned 36.34%. Over the last month GHM returned −5.40% and ZDD returned 0.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GHM has a size of TRY 531.9M with 7,130 investors, while ZDD has a size of TRY 522.1M with 1,361 investors. GHM leads in size and GHM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GHM is 6 out of 7 and that of ZDD is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.