Yatırımcı.AI

GED vs GFH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GED (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GFH (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GEDGFH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GED vs GFH Fund Comparison
MetricGEDGFHCategory median
Daily−1.46%−1.05%−1.84%
1 week−4.19%−2.88%−4.21%
1 month−9.69%−6.39%−9.02%
3 months−7.50%−4.02%−10.58%
6 months−7.55%−4.47%−9.82%
YTD18.54%15.67%9.80%
1 year28.92%22.65%18.36%
3 years123.67%111.83%93.24%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GED vs GFH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GED (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temettü Ödeyen Şirketler Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GFH (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Sürdürülebilirlik Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, GED leads in 4 and GFH leads in 6. GED is a Stock Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GFH is a Stock Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GFH leads (−1.05% vs −1.46%). 1 week: GFH leads (−2.88% vs −4.19%). 1 month: GFH leads (−6.39% vs −9.69%). 3 months: GFH leads (−4.02% vs −7.50%). 6 months: GFH leads (−4.47% vs −7.55%). YTD: GED leads (18.54% vs 15.67%). 1 year: GED leads (28.92% vs 22.65%). 3 years: GED leads (123.67% vs 111.83%). Size (TRY): GED leads (2B vs 1.7B). Investors: GFH leads (84,047 vs 38,958).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GED returned 18.54% and GFH returned 15.67%; over the last year GED returned 28.92% and GFH returned 22.65%. Over the last month GED returned −9.69% and GFH returned −6.39%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GED has a size of TRY 2B with 38,958 investors, while GFH has a size of TRY 1.7B with 84,047 investors. GED leads in size and GFH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GED is 6 out of 7 and that of GFH is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.