Yatırımcı.AI

GAH vs GZG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GAH (Garanti Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GAHGZG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GAH vs GZG Fund Comparison
MetricGAHGZGCategory median
Daily−0.44%−0.07%−0.41%
1 week−0.71%2.23%−1.69%
1 month−0.95%−2.09%−3.34%
3 months3.63%3.34%0.00%
6 months10.53%23.76%4.10%
YTD23.27%31.73%21.58%
1 year31.57%39.51%30.90%
3 years214.59%135.47%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GAH vs GZG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GAH (Garanti Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Değişken Fon) and GZG (Garanti Portföy Sağlık ve Genetik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GAH leads in 4 and GZG leads in 7. GAH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZG leads (−0.07% vs −0.44%). 1 week: GZG leads (2.23% vs −0.71%). 1 month: GAH leads (−0.95% vs −2.09%). 3 months: GAH leads (3.63% vs 3.34%). 6 months: GZG leads (23.76% vs 10.53%). YTD: GZG leads (31.73% vs 23.27%). 1 year: GZG leads (39.51% vs 31.57%). 3 years: GAH leads (214.59% vs 135.47%). Size (TRY): GZG leads (360.6M vs 340.1M). Investors: GZG leads (3,611 vs 2,470). Risk: GAH leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GAH returned 23.27% and GZG returned 31.73%; over the last year GAH returned 31.57% and GZG returned 39.51%. Over the last month GAH returned −0.95% and GZG returned −2.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, GAH has a size of TRY 340.1M with 2,470 investors, while GZG has a size of TRY 360.6M with 3,611 investors. GZG leads in size and GZG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GAH is 3 out of 7 and that of GZG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.